ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND@#The dose of Sugammadex for rescue reversal of intense neuromuscular block has not been studied in children. The only recommended dose of Sugammadex in children is 2mg/kg to reverse a shallow block. @*OBJECTIVES@#To assess the efficacy and safety of Sugammadex 2mg/kg and 4mg/kg as immediate rescue reversal of intense rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in pediatric patients@*METHODS@#80 children, aged 2 to 11 years old, requiring general anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized prospective study. Group 1 given Sugammadex 2mg/kg (40 subjects) while Group 2 received Sugammadex 4mg/kg (40 subjects), at the end of the procedure if PTC=0. The Recovery Time was recorded (TOF ratio ≥0.9) (Primary Outcome). Discharge readiness in the PACU was assessed using Modified Aldrete Scale (Secondary Outcome). Monitoring of adverse effects in the ward continued until 24 hours postoperatively.@*RESULTS@#There were significantly more patients in the Sugammadex 4mg/kg that had a recovery time of ≤2min as compared to those given Sugammadex 2mg/kg (p=0.012). There was no significant difference in the Aldrete score between the two groups (p=0.2776). All patients achieved a very satisfactory discharge score in the PACU. The adverse effects experienced by the patients in the two doses of Sugammadex in the PACU and up to 24 hours postoperatively were not significantly different.@*CONCLUSION@#Sugammadex 4mg/kg can be considered safe and effective as an immediate reversal agent for rocuronium-induced intense neuromuscular blockade in children.@*RECOMMENDATIONS@#Clinicians should identify if Sugammadex 6mg/kg, compared with 4mg/kg, would translate to a shorter Recovery time to a TOF ratio of 0.9. The time from TOF ratio of 0.9 to the time of extubation should be measured to increase the efficacy and safety assessment of Sugammadex in this age group.
ABSTRACT
@#<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Caudal epidural anesthesia is commonly performed in conjunction with general anesthesia. Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine are used in epidural blockade that provide anesthesia and analgesia intraoperative and post-operatively.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>OBJECTIVES:</strong> To compare the intraoperative and postoperative efficacy and safety of Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine in children undergoing elective sub-umbilical operations under general and caudal anesthesia.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>METHODS:</strong> Randomized control trial done in Philippine Children's Medical Center. Sixty-one subjects aged 6-months -8 years old, ASA I-II, undergoing subumbilical operations were randomly grouped to receive Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine during anesthesia induction. Hemodynamic parameters, Bromage, and CHIPPS were recorded.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>RESULTS:</strong> Results suggest both drugs have a significant effect in lowering heart rate and MAP. Bromage scores for patients from both groups are consistent at 0. The number of patients with a CHIPPS classification of 4-10, is significantly higher for bupivacaine group than levobupivacaine group.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> Both Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine provide adequate analgesia intraoperatively with no reports of intraoperative movement, increased inhalational agent concentration and additional intravenous analgesics. Post-operatively, no adverse effects and motor block was noted however Levobupivacaine has a longer efficacy as it required lesser rescue does post-operatively compared to Bupivacaine. </p>